Reply to the discussion by Liu et al. on “New transient method for determining soil hydraulic conductivity function”
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Commentary and Discussion: Reply to Rao et al. and Lee et al.
In the last issue of this journal, I presented a piece that called into question some of the techniques reported in two papers in high-profile journals that purported to provide statistical evidence for the linguistic status of some ancient symbol systems (Sproat 2010a). Not surprisingly, the authors of those two papers took issue with a number of my claims, and have requested the opportunity t...
متن کاملReply to Comment by Young et al.
Had our study been, as Young et al. imply, a data trawling exercise using hundreds of variables to look for a 'thread', then doubts about its validity might be justified. However, their account of our work bears little relationship to the methods, results or conclusions we report. For example, Young et al. claim that we used 396 tests to address our primary hypothesis. In fact, we used two. You...
متن کاملUnsaturated hydraulic conductivity function based on a soil fragmentation process
We present a new two-parameter expression for relative hydraulic conductivity (RHC) of partially saturated soils. It is based on the premise of Assouline et al. [1998] that soil structures evolve from a uniform random fragmentation process. This assumption allows us to derive hydraulic properties of soils (water retention curves and unsaturated hydraulic conductivity) from primary properties, s...
متن کاملReply to Liu et al.: HNF4A and PTBP1 expression in the brain of neurodegenerative disease patients.
We thank Liu et al. (1) for their comments on our manuscript in which hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 alpha (HNF4A) and polypyrimidine tract binding protein 1 (PTBP1) are identified as potential dynamic biomarkers for Parkinson’s disease (PD) (2). In our study, transcriptomic and network-based metaanalysis identified HNF4A and PTBP1 as the most significant up-regulated and down-regulated genes, res...
متن کاملReply to Gratiy et al.
TO THE EDITOR: Gratiy et al. (2013) proposed two alternative explanations for the nonbalanced current source density (CSD) estimates in Riera et al. (2012). Their commentary was based on a particular interpretation of the role played by the Ampere-Maxwell Law in the genesis of the electric fields for macroscopic media. In this Reply, we will provide further information to stimulate the debate i...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Canadian Geotechnical Journal
سال: 2017
ISSN: 0008-3674,1208-6010
DOI: 10.1139/cgj-2016-0589